Legal Information on South Carolina Law
What is the Law on Medical Malpractice?
Medical malpractice in South Carolina is a type of personal injury law that allows you to recover if you are being treated by a medical professional and they deviate from what an ordinary person in their field would do under the same or similar circumstances.
Essentially, what this means is that if a hospital, doctor, or nurse does anything other than what the standard in their profession requires, they can be at fault if their mistake causes you injury.
In this article you will learn:
- How to determine if you have a medical malpractice case
- What a “standard of care” is
- How to determine the standard of care in a particular case
- The steps of a negligence case
Do you have a medical malpractice case?
Determine if You Have a Medical Malpractice Case
- Did you go to the hospital or doctor and have an unexpected outcome?
- Did your medical provider create a course of treatment that didn’t improve your situation?
- Did things only get worse from their treatment?
If the answer to any of these questions is yes, then you may have been a victim of medical malpractice. You need to know what the law requires before you can bring a case for medical malpractice.
First, you need to speak to a lawyer and tell your lawyer about the case. Then, if your lawyer feels as though your case has merit, your lawyer will hire an expert on your behalf to review your medical records and determine if a reasonable medical provider in the same or similar circumstances would have acted in the same way.
“Medical Malpractice law is based under the legal tort of “negligence.”
Negligence has four basic elements: Duty, Breach, Causation and Damages.”
Standards of Care:
The law has a term of art “Standard of Care.” This basically means did the doctor do what other doctors think he or she should have done in the situation? If a doctor did anything other than what a reasonable doctor would have done, then it will be alleged that they deviated from the standard of care.
An expert will testify as to what he or she believes the standard of care is and that the treating doctor departed from it. Defense experts may testify as to a different standard and that the doctor complied with it.
How do you know what the standard of care is?
The standard of care is not something that you can find on the internet. It is complex and requires years of medical training to determine. When hiring an expert to review your case, it is important that the expert be from the field or specialty of medicine where it is alleged the deviation from the standard of care occurred.
This is really dependent on what type of injury you sustained while you were being treated by a medical provider and how complex your issue is. If you have slipped and fallen while at a hospital an expert may not be required. But if you have complex brain surgery that results in some injury then multiple experts may be required.
Medical Malpractice law is based under the legal tort of “negligence.” Negligence has four basic elements: Duty, Breach, Causation and Damages.
In a medical malpractice context, the first question you have to ask is: did the doctor have a duty to treat you? If a doctor did not accept you as a patient and referred you to someone else recovering damages can be difficult because if they don’t take you as a patient, they generally owe you no duty.
The second question is: if they had a duty to care for you, did they breach their duty to treat you within the standard of care? Experts will testify as to what the standard of care is for each specialty involved in your care, and how the treating provider deviated from this standard. Ultimately, the jury will have to decide what the standard is after listening to all the evidence including testimony from all experts.
If a jury finds that the defendant doctor breached the standard of care, then the next inquiry is to determine if, because of the breach, you sustained injury or damages. Your lawyer must prove that at least one deviation from the standard of care caused you to sustain injury. If a doctor treats you for a headache and misses the diagnosis but ultimately the headache gets better and you don’t suffer any damages, then there is a problem with causation because no injury was sustained.
Next, there is the issue of damages. If you don’t sustain damages, then you can’t sue someone. You can’t sue someone just because you don’t like them or how they treat you. There must be actual injury sustained. However, mental anguish and emotional distress are injuries which courts recognize. There is a growing understanding of psychological illnesses and the law recognizes suffering for mental and emotional suffering.
Think you have a medical malpractice case on your hands?
Medical malpractice is a complex area of the law and in most cases, there is no simple answer. Ultimately, if you feel as though you might have a case please contact a medical malpractice lawyer today to find out more info about medical malpractice and to discuss the specifics of your case.
Ready To Take Action?
It won’t cost you anything to speak with an attorney about your case.